Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015–16 F.C. Halifax Town season (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 10:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 F.C. Halifax Town season[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This season is about a team not playing in a WP:FPL. We have long-standing consensus at AFD that only teams in fully professional leagues get season articles per WP:NSEASONS. All those refs look good; but they are all WP:ROUTINE coverage with many transfer announcements and the like. Yellow Dingo (talk) 15:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:SEASONS. All the most recent AfDs have resulted in deletion (e.g. this unanimous one). Number 5 7 21:00, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NSEASONS. Consensus at WP:FOOTY is that season articles for clubs in a WP:FPL are generally notable; the National League is not fully professional. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 08:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 09:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.